Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magic Overview"

From Legends of Cphera
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "If you write a basic example of how you want Sigil magic to look I can start expanding it at my leisure - but I don't want to take it in a different direction than you envisioned...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
If you write a basic example of how you want Sigil magic to look I can start expanding it at my leisure - but I don't want to take it in a different direction than you envisioned. I need your example first.  --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 09:01, 27 August 2010 (MDT)
 
If you write a basic example of how you want Sigil magic to look I can start expanding it at my leisure - but I don't want to take it in a different direction than you envisioned. I need your example first.  --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 09:01, 27 August 2010 (MDT)
 +
 +
 +
Another thing - Can we specify if things require verbal/somatic/etc components? For example, I feel that everything in Pyrokinesis requires somatic components except for ignition when used as a touch effect, allowing you to burn through your ropes when bound but not to light the guard on fire with your hands still tied.  Any thoughts?  --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 09:12, 27 August 2010 (MDT)

Revision as of 08:12, 27 August 2010

If you write a basic example of how you want Sigil magic to look I can start expanding it at my leisure - but I don't want to take it in a different direction than you envisioned. I need your example first. --Noirmachina 09:01, 27 August 2010 (MDT)


Another thing - Can we specify if things require verbal/somatic/etc components? For example, I feel that everything in Pyrokinesis requires somatic components except for ignition when used as a touch effect, allowing you to burn through your ropes when bound but not to light the guard on fire with your hands still tied. Any thoughts? --Noirmachina 09:12, 27 August 2010 (MDT)