Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magic Overview"
Noirmachina (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Yeah. That sounds good. Make sure there are ways to bypass this. Perhaps metamagic feats. --[[User:Drizztmainsword|Drizztmainsword]] 12:45, 27 August 2010 (MDT) | * Yeah. That sounds good. Make sure there are ways to bypass this. Perhaps metamagic feats. --[[User:Drizztmainsword|Drizztmainsword]] 12:45, 27 August 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Heling magic - We have it, yes? Where is it categorized under and what does it look like? I need this info to write certain rules I am thinking about. Please advise. | ||
| + | --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 19:15, 30 August 2010 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:15, 30 August 2010
If you write a basic example of how you want Sigil magic to look I can start expanding it at my leisure - but I don't want to take it in a different direction than you envisioned. I need your example first. --Noirmachina 09:01, 27 August 2010 (MDT)
- Sigil Magic is still being worked out. Sorry, but this one's going to take a while. --Drizztmainsword 12:45, 27 August 2010 (MDT)
Another thing - Can we specify if things require verbal/somatic/etc components? For example, I feel that everything in Pyrokinesis requires somatic components except for ignition when used as a touch effect, allowing you to burn through your ropes when bound but not to light the guard on fire with your hands still tied. Any thoughts? --Noirmachina 09:12, 27 August 2010 (MDT)
- Yeah. That sounds good. Make sure there are ways to bypass this. Perhaps metamagic feats. --Drizztmainsword 12:45, 27 August 2010 (MDT)
Heling magic - We have it, yes? Where is it categorized under and what does it look like? I need this info to write certain rules I am thinking about. Please advise. --Noirmachina 19:15, 30 August 2010 (MDT)
