Difference between revisions of "Talk:Locana"
(Created page with "= +8 Bonus = Is that necessary? The spell already allows for the caster to not need the original for such checks. Or are you thinking that using this spell is in fact easier than...") |
Noirmachina (Talk | contribs) (→More Tiers and Abilities) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:Drizztmainsword|Drizztmainsword]] 23:17, 30 August 2010 (MDT) | --[[User:Drizztmainsword|Drizztmainsword]] 23:17, 30 August 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The second one. You aren't perfect, but you know that damn object better than the back of your hand. At this point the craft check is to see whether or not you know the techniques for making the object (dying techniques, paper quality, etc.), because you know it so well the other details can't be left out. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 05:12, 31 August 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Wording= | ||
| + | |||
| + | "that grants the beneficiary of the spell" This is worded really strangely. Rewrite it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 13:54, 19 September 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | =More Tiers and Abilities= | ||
| + | We need to hit at least tier 6. Got any ideas? | ||
| + | |||
| + | -[[User:Drizztmainsword|Drizztmainsword]] 08:11, 20 September 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Sure... I'll try to get on it sometime today. I'm confident that I can come up with something. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I may overhaul parts of this... I'm not sure it's good to let them grant others this power so early on. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 08:45, 20 September 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | At the same time, I don't think that power should be held off to tier 5, or be so expensive. I think one of the defining features of Discipline magic should be that any constant effect can be given to another person. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Drizztmainsword|Drizztmainsword]] 14:10, 20 September 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Really? I think it's clearly easier to give it to yourself though. Go ahead and cheapen it and move it down to whatever tier you think is appropriate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Noirmachina|Noirmachina]] 16:19, 20 September 2010 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:19, 20 September 2010
+8 Bonus
Is that necessary? The spell already allows for the caster to not need the original for such checks. Or are you thinking that using this spell is in fact easier than having to constantly compare between two objects? 'Cause I can get on board with that second one.
--Drizztmainsword 23:17, 30 August 2010 (MDT)
The second one. You aren't perfect, but you know that damn object better than the back of your hand. At this point the craft check is to see whether or not you know the techniques for making the object (dying techniques, paper quality, etc.), because you know it so well the other details can't be left out.
--Noirmachina 05:12, 31 August 2010 (MDT)
Wording
"that grants the beneficiary of the spell" This is worded really strangely. Rewrite it?
--Noirmachina 13:54, 19 September 2010 (MDT)
More Tiers and Abilities
We need to hit at least tier 6. Got any ideas?
-Drizztmainsword 08:11, 20 September 2010 (MDT)
Sure... I'll try to get on it sometime today. I'm confident that I can come up with something.
I may overhaul parts of this... I'm not sure it's good to let them grant others this power so early on.
--Noirmachina 08:45, 20 September 2010 (MDT)
At the same time, I don't think that power should be held off to tier 5, or be so expensive. I think one of the defining features of Discipline magic should be that any constant effect can be given to another person.
--Drizztmainsword 14:10, 20 September 2010 (MDT)
Really? I think it's clearly easier to give it to yourself though. Go ahead and cheapen it and move it down to whatever tier you think is appropriate.
--Noirmachina 16:19, 20 September 2010 (MDT)
